Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Crystal facet engineering provides a promising approach to tailor the performance of catalysts because of the close relationship between the photocatalytic activity and the surface atomic and electronic structures. An in-depth understanding mechanism of crystal facet-dependent CO₂ photoreduction is still an open question. Herein, two different types of porous ZnO nanocatalysts are used as model photocatalysts for the investigation, which are, respectively, with exposed {110} and {001} facets. The porous ZnO with an exposed {110} facet exhibits superior photocatalytic activity to the one with the {001} facet. Various influencing factors have been thoroughly studied both theoretically and/or experimentally, including light harvesting (i.e., band gap), reduction capability (potential of conduction band), crystallinity, CO₂ adsorption ability, CO₂ activation, and charge separation. The major influencing factors are eventually figured out based on the experimental and calculation results. The product selectivity and the influence of the hole scavenger can be explained too. Our work may pave a way for directing the future rational design of efficient photocatalysts for CO₂ reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: