Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The automatic system yielded results that were similar to those obtained by experienced technologists. Very good ICCs were obtained for many primary PSG outcome measures. This automated scoring software, particularly if supplemented with manual editing, may increase laboratory efficiency and standardize PSG scoring results within and across sleep centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malhotra et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: