Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: Design and characterization of a radiation biodosimetry device are complicated by the fact that the requisite data are not available in the intended use population, namely humans exposed to a single, whole-body radiation dose. Instead, one must turn to model systems. We discuss our studies utilizing healthy, unexposed humans, human bone marrow transplant patients undergoing total body irradiation (TBI), non-human primates subjected to the same irradiation regimen received by the human TBI patients and NHPs given a single, whole-body dose of ionizing radiation.Materials and Methods: We use Bayesian linear mixed models to characterize the association between NHP and human expression patterns in radiation response genes when exposed to a common exposure regimen and across exposure regimens within the same species.Results: We show that population average differences in expression of our radiation response genes from one to another model system are comparable to typical differences between two randomly sampled members of a given model system and that these differences are smaller, on average, for linear combinations of the probe data and for the model-based combinations employed for dose prediction as part of a radiation biodosimetry device.Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that dose estimates based on our gene list will be accurate when applied to humans who have received a single, whole-body exposure to ionizing radiation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iversen et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: