Supported by increasingly available reserves, natural gas is achieving greater adoption as a cleaner-burning alternative to coal in the power sector. As a result, carbon capture and sequestration from natural gas-fired power plants is an attractive strategy to mitigate global anthropogenic CO₂ emissions. However, the separation of CO₂ from other components in the flue streams of gas-fired power plants is particularly challenging due to the low CO₂ partial pressure (∼40 mbar), which necessitates that candidate separation materials bind CO₂ strongly at low partial pressures (≤4 mbar) to capture ≥90% of the emitted CO₂. High partial pressures of O₂ (120 mbar) and water (80 mbar) in these flue streams have also presented significant barriers to the deployment of new technologies for CO₂ capture from gas-fired power plants. Here, we demonstrate that functionalization of the metal-organic framework Mg₂(dobpdc) (dobpdc⁴⁻ = 4,4'-dioxidobiphenyl-3,3'-dicarboxylate) with the cyclic diamine 2-(aminomethyl)piperidine (2-ampd) produces an adsorbent that is capable of ≥90% CO₂ capture from a humid natural gas flue emission stream, as confirmed by breakthrough measurements. This material captures CO₂ by a cooperative mechanism that enables access to a large CO₂ cycling capacity with a small temperature swing (2.4 mmol CO₂/g with ΔT = 100 °C). Significantly, multicomponent adsorption experiments, infrared spectroscopy, magic angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy, and van der Waals-corrected density functional theory studies suggest that water enhances CO₂ capture in 2-ampd-Mg₂(dobpdc) through hydrogen-bonding interactions with the carbamate groups of the ammonium carbamate chains formed upon CO₂ adsorption, thereby increasing the thermodynamic driving force for CO₂ binding. In light of the exceptional thermal and oxidative stability of 2-ampd-Mg₂(dobpdc), its high CO₂ adsorption capacity, and its high CO₂ capture rate from a simulated natural gas flue emission stream, this material is one of the most promising adsorbents to date for this important separation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siegelman et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: