PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 20, 2007IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence4,300 citations

Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Information

View Full Paper
HHHeiko Hirschmüller

Key Points

  • The aim is to improve stereo image processing using Semi-Global Matching with a focus on mutual information methods.
  • Utilized pixelwise mutual information for matching cost to account for radiometric differences.
  • Implemented a smoothness constraint for optimization through a pathwise approach.
  • Conducted evaluation using standard stereo images with a focus on subpixel accuracy.
  • SGM demonstrates top-ranked algorithm performance for stereo processing on standard images.
  • Achieved fast processing with linear complexity to pixels and disparity range, runtime of 1-2s.
  • Mutual Information matching exhibited robust tolerance to various radiometric transformations.

Abstract

This paper describes the Semi-Global Matching (SGM) stereo method. It uses a pixelwise, Mutual Information based matching cost for compensating radiometric differences of input images. Pixelwise matching is supported by a smoothness constraint that is usually expressed as a global cost function. SGM performs a fast approximation by pathwise optimizations from all directions. The discussion also addresses occlusion detection, subpixel refinement and multi-baseline matching. Additionally, postprocessing steps for removing outliers, recovering from specific problems of structured environments and the interpolation of gaps are presented. Finally, strategies for processing almost arbitrarily large images and fusion of disparity images using orthographic projection are proposed.A comparison on standard stereo images shows that SGM is among the currently top-ranked algorithms and is best, if subpixel accuracy is considered. The complexity is linear to the number of pixels and disparity range, which results in a runtime of just 1-2s on typical test images. An in depth evaluation of the Mutual Information based matching cost demonstrates a tolerance against a wide range of radiometric transformations. Finally, examples of reconstructions from huge aerial frame and pushbroom images demonstrate that the presented ideas are working well on practical problems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heiko Hirschmüller (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8be37d2f7327e70ae41dchttps://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2007.1166
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper