PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2004Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing581 citationsOpen Access

Accuracy of Airborne Lidar-Derived Elevation

View Full Paper
MHMichael E. HodgsonPBPatrick Bresnahan

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the accuracy of lidar-derived elevation data by comparing it with field-verified reference points.
  • Airborne lidar data collected at a flying height of 1207 meters was evaluated, focusing on six land-cover categories.
  • Reference elevations were surveyed using total-station and rapid-static GPS techniques for accuracy.
  • Error assessment decomposed errors into lidar measurements, horizontal displacement, interpolation, and surveyor errors.
  • RMSE values ranged from 17 to 19 cm for low-cover categories to 26 cm for deciduous forests.
  • Lidar system measurements were the largest source of error, followed by interpolation and horizontal displacement errors.
  • Elevation errors were found to be larger on steeper slopes, estimated to be twice as large compared to low slopes.

Abstract

As part of a countywide large-scale mapping effort for Richland County, South Carolina, an accuracy assessment of a recently acquired lidar-derived data set was conducted. Airborne lidar (2-m nominal posting) was collected at a flying height of 1207 meters above ground level (AGL) using an Optech ALTM (Airborne Laser Terrain Mapper) 1210 system. Unique to this study are the reference point elevations. Rather than using an interpolation approach for gathering observed elevations at reference points, the x-y coordinates of lidar points were located in the field and these elevations were surveyed. Using both total-station-based and rapid-static GPS techniques, observed vertical heights were measured at each reference lidar posting. The variability of vertical accuracy was evaluated for six land-cover categories. Root-meansquared error (RMSE) values ranged from a low of 17 to 19 cm (pavement, low grass, and evergreen forests) to a high of 26 cm (deciduous forests). The unique error assessment of lidar postings also allowed for the creation of an error budget model. The observed lidar elevation error was decomposed into errors from lidar system measurements, horizontal displacement, interpolation error, and surveyor error. A crossvalidation approach was used to assess the observed interpolated lidar elevation error for each field-verified reference point. In order of decreasing importance, the lidar system measurements were the dominant source of error followed by interpolation error, horizontal displacement error, and surveyor error. Observed elevation error in steeper slopes (e.g., 25°) was estimated to be twice as large as those on low slopes (e.g., 1.5°).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hodgson et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8c998a5ecc596b5d18718https://doi.org/10.14358/pers.70.3.331
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper