Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Citizens are frequently misinformed about political issues and candidates but the circumstances under which inaccurate beliefs emerge are not fully understood. This experimental study demonstrates that the independent experience of two emotions, anger and anxiety, in part determines whether citizens consider misinformation in a partisan or open-minded fashion. Anger encourages partisan, motivated evaluation of uncorrected misinformation that results in beliefs consistent with the supported political party, while anxiety at times promotes initial beliefs based less on partisanship and more on the information environment. However, exposure to corrections improves belief accuracy, regardless of emotion or partisanship. The results indicate that the unique experience of anger and anxiety can affect the accuracy of political beliefs by strengthening or attenuating the influence of partisanship.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brian E. Weeks
University of Michigan
Journal of Communication
University of Michigan
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brian E. Weeks (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8d2112c39562886ae2e82 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12164
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: