A critical examination of the procedures commonly used to estimate earthquake-induced sliding displacements of earth structures is essential due to their widespread use and application to new types of systems such as solid-waste landfills. Rigid sliding block analyses are performed, along with decoupled and fully coupled deformable sliding block analyses using a distributed mass model with a mode shape appropriate for an earth structure. Results from using several earthquake ground motions and a sinusoidal input indicate that a decoupled analysis does not always provide a conservative estimate of sliding displacement. Conservative decoupled displacements are calculated for lower values of yield acceleration (i.e., k y /k max < 0.6) when the fundamental period of the sliding mass is less than twice the mean period of the input ground motion. For systems with larger values of k y /k max or large fundamental periods, a decoupled analysis may predict smaller displacements than a fully coupled analysis. However, in these cases, the displacements calculated from both analyses are generally small (i.e., less than a few centimetres). A decoupled analysis generally provides an estimate of the coupled sliding displacement within a factor of three, which is conservative, except for particular cases where caution is warranted. A rigid sliding block analysis can be significantly unconservative, and it should not be used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rathje et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: