Cohort study reveals differences in dementia risk prediction accuracy in an Australian cohort, highlighting the superior performance of a hybrid model.
ANU-ADRI and LIBRA were better dementia prediction tools than CAIDE for identification of high-risk individuals in this cohort. ANU-ADRI overestimated and LIBRA underestimated the risk. The new hybrid model had a higher predictive performance than the other models but it needs to be validated independently in longitudinal studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geethadevi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: