PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2017Qualitative Inquiry644 citations

Ethics in Autoethnography and Collaborative Autoethnography

View Full Paper
JLJudith C. Lapadat

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Autoethnography as an approach to inquiry has gained a widespread following in part because it addresses the ethical issue of representing, speaking for, or appropriating the voice of others. In this article, I place the emergence of autoethnography within its historical context and discuss the contributions and limitations of autoethnography as an approach to inquiry. I examine ethical aspects of autoethnography, showing how the method is rooted in ethical intent, yet autoethnographers nevertheless face ethical challenges. I suggest that collaborative autoethnography, a multivocal approach in which two or more researchers work together to share personal stories and interpret the pooled autoethnographic data, builds upon and extends the reach of autoethnography and addresses some of its methodological and ethical issues. In particular, collaborative autoethnography supports a shift from individual to collective agency, thereby offering a path toward personally engaging, nonexploitative, accessible research that makes a difference.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Judith C. Lapadat (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8eda4d2f7327e70ae4818https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704462
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper