A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients

Jee-Eun Chang; Hyerim Kim; Jung‐Man Lee; Seong-Won Min; Dongwook Won; Kwanghoon Jun; Jin-Young Hwang

doi:10.1186/s12871-019-0785-8

July 4, 2019BMC AnesthesiologyOpen Access

A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Figures

Why the study?

Does the LMA-protector™ improve outcomes compared to the i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients?

Structured PICO

Does the LMA-protector™ improve outcomes compared to the i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients?

P

Population

paralyzed, anesthetized patients

I

Intervention

LMA-protector™

C

Comparator

i-gel™

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Abstract

No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Chang et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8f8d42c87b79b92d1881c https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0785-8

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients

Figures

Structured PICO

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients

Figures

Structured PICO

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading