Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The workshop CfP assumes that downstream evaluation of word embeddings is impractical, and that a valid evaluation metric for pairs of word embeddings can be found. I argue below that if so, the only meaningful evaluation procedure is comparison with measures of human word processing in the wild. Such evaluation is non-trivial, but I present a practical procedure here, evaluating word embeddings as features in a multi-dimensional regression model predicting brain imaging or eyetracking word-level aggregate statistics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anders Søgaard (2016) studied this question.