The modeling of finite-extent semiconductor nanostructures that are embedded in a host material requires a proper boundary treatment for a finite simulation domain. For the study of a self-assembled InAs dot embedded in GaAs, three kinds of boundary conditions are examined within the empirical tight-binding model: (i) the periodic boundary condition, (ii) raising the orbital energies of surface atoms, and (iii) raising the energies of dangling bonds at the surface. The periodic boundary condition requires a smooth boundary and consequently a larger GaAs buffer than the two nonperiodic boundary conditions. Between the nonperiodic conditions, the dangling-bond energy shift is more numerically efficient than the orbital-energy shift, in terms of the elimination of nonphysical surface states in the energy region of interest for interior states. A dangling-bond energy shift larger than 5 eV efficiently eliminates all of the surface states and leads to interior states that are highly insensitive to the choice of the energy shift.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: