Neuro-ophthalmologists play a major role in protecting vision and life [1–4]. Misdiagnosis prior to neuro-ophthalmology review may occur in up to 69% of cases [1] with a quarter coming to harm [2] due to inadequate history, examination, differential diagnosis, incorrect targeting and interpretation of investigations [2]. Studies also found that Neuro-ophthalmology review impacted on care in 99% and saved life or vision in 2% [2] however over one third of patients had a delay in their care [3]. These results suggest inadequacy of both access to neuro-ophthalmology services [5], and exposure to neuro-ophthalmology during general training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mollan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: