This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Interest in the study of vulnerability has experienced impressive growth across various disciplines. To contribute to this major but scattered development in the study of vulnerability, this article argues for a multidisciplinary life-course framework. This framework promotes a systemic and dynamic perspective focused on three complementary research directions: multidimensional, multilevel, and multidirectional. On the basis of this life course perspective, the authors also propose a definition of vulnerability as a dynamic process of stress and resources across various domains of life (i.e., work, family, health, migration, etc.), levels (i.e., person, group, collective), and time (i.e., long-term processes).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spini et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: