Why the study?
Since 2013, new papers revealed controversies and refined concepts regarding CR exercise intensity, and resistance training was not previously addressed, prompting an updated position statement.
This updated EAPC position statement provides comprehensive guidance on assessing and prescribing exercise intensity for both aerobic and resistance training in cardiovascular rehabilitation.
Supports standardized intensity prescription in CV rehabilitation; extends prior EAPC guidance for clinical use and trial design.
A proper determination of the exercise intensity is important for the rehabilitation of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) since it affects the effectiveness and medical safety of exercise training. In 2013, the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), together with the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, published a position statement on aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR). Since this publication, many subsequent papers were published concerning the determination of the exercise intensity in CR, in which some controversies were revealed and some of the commonly applied concepts were further refined. Moreover, how to determine the exercise intensity during resistance training was not covered in this position paper. In light of these new findings, an update on how to determine the exercise intensity for patients with CVD is mandatory, both for aerobic and resistance exercises. In this EAPC position paper, it will be explained in detail which objective and subjective methods for CR exercise intensity determination exist for aerobic and resistance training, together with their (dis)advantages and practical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hansen et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: