PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1995American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine816 citations

Upper Airway and Soft Tissue Anatomy in Normal Subjects and Patients With Sleep-Disordered Breathing. Significance of the Lateral Pharyngeal Walls

View Full Paper
RSR J SchwabKGK B GuptaWGWarren B. Gefter

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the geometry of the upper airway between normal subjects and those with sleep-disordered breathing.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging was conducted to assess upper airway dimensions in 68 subjects.
  • Subjects included 21 normal individuals, 21 with mild apnea/snoring, and 26 with obstructive sleep apnea.
  • Analysis focused on the lateral dimensions of the airway and surrounding soft tissue structures.
  • Minimum airway area was significantly smaller in apneic patients compared to normal subjects.
  • Predominant airway narrowing in apneic patients occurred laterally, with no significant anterior-posterior dimension difference.
  • Thickness of lateral pharyngeal muscular walls, rather than fat pad size, primarily contributed to narrowing in apneic subjects.

Abstract

The geometry and caliber of the upper airway in apneic patients differs from those in normal subjects. The apneic airway is smaller and is narrowed laterally. Examination of the soft tissue structures surrounding the upper airway can lead to an understanding of these apneic airway dimensional changes. Magnetic resonance imaging was utilized to study the upper airway and surrounding soft tissue structures in 21 normal subjects, 21 snorer/mild apneic subjects, and 26 patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The major findings of this investigation in the 68 subjects were as follows: (1) minimum airway area was significantly smaller in apneic compared with normal subjects and occurred in the retropalatal region; (2) airway narrowing in apneic patients was predominantly in the lateral dimension; there was no significant difference in the anterior-posterior (AP) airway dimension between subject groups; and (3) distance between the rami of the mandible was equal between subject groups, and thus the narrowing of the lateral dimension was not explained by differences in bony structure; (4) lateral airway narrowing was explained predominantly by larger pharyngeal walls in apneic patients (the parapharyngeal fat pads were not closer together as one would expect if the airway walls were compressed by fat); and (5) fat pad size at the level of the minimum airway was not greater in apneic than normal subjects. At the minimum airway area, thickness of the lateral pharyngeal muscular walls rather than enlargement of the parapharyngeal fat pads was the predominant anatomic factor causing airway narrowing in apneic subjects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schwab et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d911d6d8690e49a7835832https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.152.5.7582313
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper