Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
These findings indicate potential sources of difficulty, arising from GC biases, in genome sequencing that could be pre-emptively addressed with methodological optimizations provided that the GC biases inherent to the relevant workflow are understood. Furthermore, it is recommended that a more critical approach be taken in quantitative abundance estimates in metagenomic studies. In the future, metagenomic studies should take steps to account for the effects of GC bias before drawing conclusions, or they should use a demonstrably unbiased workflow.
Browne et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: