PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 28, 2019Conservation Biology636 citationsOpen Access

Meta‐analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior

View Full Paper
JWJulie WhitburnWLWayne L. LinklaterWAWokje Abrahamse

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Understanding what drives environmentally protective or destructive behavior is important to the design and implementation of effective public policies to encourage people's engagement in proenvironmental behavior (PEB). Research shows that a connection to nature is associated with greater engagement in PEB. However, the variety of instruments and methods used in these studies poses a major barrier to integrating research findings. We conducted a meta-analysis of the relationship between connection to nature and PEB. We identified studies through a systematic review of the literature and used Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software to analyze the results from 37 samples (n = 13,237) and to test for moderators. A random-effects model demonstrated a positive and significant association between connection to nature and PEB (r = 0.42, 95% CI 0.36, 0.47, p < 0.001). People who are more connected to nature reported greater engagement in PEB. Standard tests indicated little effect of publication bias in the sample. There was significant heterogeneity among the samples. Univariate categorical analyses showed that the scales used to measure connection to nature and PEB were significant moderators and explained the majority of the between-study variance. The geographic location of a study, age of participants, and the percentage of females in a study were not significant moderators. We found that a deeper connection to nature may partially explain why some people behave more proenvironmentally than others and that the relationship is ubiquitous. Facilitating a stronger connection to nature may result in greater engagement in PEB and conservation, although more longitudinal studies with randomized experiments are required to demonstrate causation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Whitburn et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d915c9d8690e49a783588fhttps://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13381
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Culture and the natural environment2015 · 147 citations
  2. 2Biophilia1984 · 3,294 citations
  3. 3Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis.1998 · 2,868 citations
  4. 4Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change2015 · 4,710 citations
  5. 5Comprehensive Meta‐Analysis Software2022 · 343 citations