Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
December 31, 2009The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in Comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in Patients with Focal Articular Cartilage Defects

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

NGNicholas J. GrecoAAAllen F. AndersonBMBarton J. Mann

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Randomized trial compares IKDC SKF with other knee measures in patients with cartilage defects, indicating suitable alternatives.

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the reliability and responsiveness of the IKDC SKF compared to other knee-specific outcome measures in patients with cartilage lesions.
  • Compared IKDC SKF with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36.
  • Included patients undergoing articular cartilage surgery.
  • Analyzed outcomes related to symptoms and daily function.
  • IKDC SKF showed comparable reliability to other measures in assessing knee function.
  • The instrument effectively measures symptoms and daily activities in patients undergoing surgery.
  • IKDC SKF is recommended as a suitable alternative for tracking recovery in these patients.

Cite This Study

Greco et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d91c0116f0d2beeba3c06ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509354163
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share