Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We use the Budyko framework to calculate catchment‐scale evapotranspiration ( E ) and runoff ( Q ) as a function of two climatic factors, precipitation ( P ) and evaporative demand ( E o = 0.75 times the pan evaporation rate), and a third parameter that encodes the catchment properties ( n ) and modifies how P is partitioned between E and Q . This simple theory accurately predicted the long‐term evapotranspiration ( E ) and runoff ( Q ) for the Murray‐Darling Basin (MDB) in southeast Australia. We extend the theory by developing a simple and novel analytical expression for the effects on E and Q of small perturbations in P , E o , and n . The theory predicts that a 10% change in P , with all else constant, would result in a 26% change in Q in the MDB. Future climate scenarios (2070–2099) derived using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 climate model output highlight the diversity of projections for P (±30%) with a correspondingly large range in projections for Q (±80%) in the MDB. We conclude with a qualitative description about the impact of changes in catchment properties on water availability and focus on the interaction between vegetation change, increasing atmospheric [CO 2 ], and fire frequency. We conclude that the modern version of the Budyko framework is a useful tool for making simple and transparent estimates of changes in water availability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roderick et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: