This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This paper puts forward a new notion of a proof based on computational complexity and explores its implications for computation at large. Computationally sound proofs provide, in a novel and meaningful framework, answers to old and new questions in complexity theory. In particular, given a random oracle or a new complexity assumption, they enable us to prove that verifying is easier than deciding for all theorems; provide a quite effective way to prove membership in computationally hard languages (such as Co-N P-complete ones); and show that every computation possesses a short certificate vouching its correctness. Finally, if a special type of computationally sound proof exists, we show that Blum's notion of program checking can be meaningfully broadened so as to prove that N P-complete languages are checkable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silvio Micali (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: