Methane (CH 4 ) emissions from aquatic systems should be coupled to CH 4 production, and thus a temperature‐dependent process, yet recent evidence suggests that modeling CH 4 emissions may be more complex due to the biotic and abiotic processes influencing emissions. We studied the magnitude and regulation of two CH 4 pathways—ebullition and diffusion—from 10 shallow ponds and 3 lakes in Québec. Ebullitive fluxes in ponds averaged 4.6 ± 4.1 mmol CH 4 m −2 d −1 , contributing ∼56% to total (diffusive + ebullitive) CH 4 emissions. In lakes, ebullition only occurred in waters < 3 m deep, averaging 1.1 ± 1.5 mmol CH 4 m −2 d −1 , and when integrated over the whole lake, contributed only 18% to 22% to total CH 4 emissions. While pond CH 4 fluxes were related to sediment temperature, with ebullition having a stronger dependence than diffusion (Q 10 , 13 vs. 10; activation energies, 168 kJ mol −1 vs. 151 kJ mol −1 ), the temperature dependency of CH 4 fluxes from lakes was absent. Combining data from ponds and lakes shows that the temperature dependency of CH 4 diffusion and ebullition is strongly modulated by system trophic status (as total phosphorus), suggesting that organic substrate limitation dampens the influence of temperature on CH 4 fluxes from oligotrophic systems. Furthermore, a strong phosphorus‐temperature interaction determines the dominant emission pathway, with ebullition disproportionately enhanced. Our results suggest that aquatic CH 4 ebullition is regulated by the interaction between ecosystem productivity and climate, and will constitute an increasingly important component of carbon emissions from northern aquatic systems under climate and environmental change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DelSontro et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: