Stimulation of mandibular growth and inhibition of maxillary growth were achieved in both treatment groups. In the C-Forsus group, a substantial amount of lower incisor protrusion was observed, whereas retrusion of lower incisors was found in the MA-Forsus group. The MA-Forsus group was found to be more advantageous as it had no dentoalveolar side effects on mandibular dentition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Türkkahraman et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: