⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

May 1, 2014Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques

Laparoscopic Versus Endoscopic Management of Choledocholithiasis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-analysis

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source→

Abstract

To some degree, laparoscopic treatment of the CBD may be a better way of removing stones than EST.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Jun-guo et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d94a579873513554835cce https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2013.0546

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Postoperative ERCP Versus Laparoscopic Choledochotomy for Clearance of Selected Bile Duct CalculiCohort Study · 2005 · 227 citations
2A Randomized, Clinical Trial to Compare Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Subsequent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Primary Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration During Cholecystectomy in Higher Risk Patients with CholedocholithiasisRCT · 2009 · 135 citations
3Laparoscopic Exploration versus Intraoperative Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Randomized TrialRCT · 2011 · 61 citations
4Choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic versus Laparoscopic ManagementCohort Study · 1999 · 38 citations
5Choledocholithiasis: Evolving standards for diagnosis and managementOriginal Research · 2006 · 226 citations