This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Electrochemical CO2 capture systems using hydroxide solutions face stiff performance trade-offs, as the hydroxide ions necessary for rapid CO2 absorption reduce the current efficiency of subsequent electrochemical CO2 release. In this work, we propose a carbonate/hydroxide separation step between CO2 absorption and release to provide a concentrated carbonate stream for efficient electrochemical release and a separate hydroxide stream for rapid absorption. We combine experiments on CO2 absorption, nanofiltration separation, and electrochemical release to build a comprehensive model that illustrates system performance trade-offs. We find that employing commercial nanofiltration membranes for separation increases the electrochemical current efficiency by as much as six-fold without sacrificing absorption rate. In the case of Direct Air Capture, the nanofiltration approach reduces costs by 20-30% and significantly increases the operational flexibility of the system. Such carbonate/hydroxide separations may also find use in other systems such as point source capture and integrated CO2 capture and conversion to valuable products.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rufer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: