It is concluded that the new craniofacial implant was more stable and showed a faster integration than the currently used implant. The data from the present study suggest that the new implant may be suitable for early loading protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sennerby et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: