PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2018Water Research887 citationsOpen Access

Quantification of microplastic mass and removal rates at wastewater treatment plants applying Focal Plane Array (FPA)-based Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) imaging

MSMárta SimonNANikki van AlstJVJes Vollertsen

Key Points

  • The aim is to quantify microplastic mass using a new FPA-based FT-IR imaging technique and argue for its importance over traditional particle number measurements.
  • Employed FPA-based Fourier Transform Infrared imaging to quantify microplastic mass.
  • Analyzed wastewater samples from Danish treatment plants for microplastic discharge.
  • Compared polymer types by mass and particle number in the study.
  • Danish wastewater treatment plants discharge approximately 3 t/year of microplastics sized 10-500 μm.
  • Annual per capita emission from the plants is 0.56 g MP/(capita year).
  • Mass and particle number distributions of different polymer types varied significantly.

Abstract

This paper presents a method for microplastic (MP) mass quantification using a Focal Plane Array-based Fourier Transform Infrared imaging technique. It discusses the issue that particle number is not a conserved base quantity and hence less suited than mass to compare independent studies on MP in the environment. It concludes that MP mass should be included when quantifying MP pollution in the environment, supplementing the conventional approach of reporting particle numbers. Applying mass as the unit of MP measurement, the paper presents data showing that Danish wastewater treatment plants discharge around 3 t/year of MP in the size range 10-500 μm. This value corresponds to an annual per capita emission from these plants of 0.56 g MP/(capita year). The distribution of polymer types by mass and particle number differed because the size of MP particles of the different material types varied.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Simon et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d952aac7f0c3ae80a3cf91https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Plastic debris in the open ocean2014 · 3,134 citations
  2. 2Identification of microplastic in effluents of waste water treatment plants using focal plane array-based micro-Fourier-transform infrared imaging2016 · 1,493 citations
  3. 3How well is microlitter purified from wastewater? – A detailed study on the stepwise removal of microlitter in a tertiary level wastewater treatment plant2016 · 778 citations
  4. 4Particle Size Measurements: Fundamentals, Practice, Quality2009 · 487 citations
  5. 5A review on Fenton and improvements to the Fenton process for wastewater treatment2013 · 1,802 citations