Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There is variability in the TKA literature with respect to the definition and derivation of measurements of clinically significant outcomes. Standardization of these values may have implications for optimal case selection and PROM-based quality measurement, ultimately improving patient satisfaction and outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beiene et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: