PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2020JAMA Surgery90 citationsOpen Access

Comparing Methods to Determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Veterans Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals

AKAlfred C. KuoNGNicholas J. GioriTBThomas Bowe

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Minimal clinically important difference estimates can be highly variable depending on the method used. Patient satisfaction measured by SAPS is a suitable anchor for the HOOS and KOOS. This study suggests that the SAPS-anchored MCID values presented here be used in future studies of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for veterans.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kuo et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d959a95e5bcb4e3b835af8https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0024
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Measurement of health status1989 · 4,984 citations
  2. 2Do Veterans Health Administration Enrollees Generalize to Other Populations?2015 · 100 citations
  3. 3Validation of the HOOS, JR: A Short-form Hip Replacement Survey2016 · 311 citations
  4. 4The Comprehensive Care Joint Replacement Model2016 · 159 citations
  5. 5The Association of Patient Satisfaction with Pain, Anxiety, and Self-Reported Physical Function2018 · 60 citations