Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: In the previously reported primary analyses of this phase 3 trial, 12 months of adjuvant pembrolizumab resulted in significantly longer recurrence- and distant metastasis-free survival than placebo in patients with resected high-risk stage III melanoma. To confirm the stability of these benefits, longer-term data were needed. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1019 patients to receive 200 mg of pembrolizumab or placebo intravenously every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses (approximately 1 year) and had previously reported data with a 15-, 36-, and 42-month median follow-up. We now report data at a median follow-up of 4.9 years. We report a number of outcomes, including recurrence-free survival in the overall population and in the subgroup of patients with cancer who were positive for the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Distant metastasis-free survival was a secondary end point. RESULTS: In the overall intention-to-treat population, pembrolizumab was still associated with longer recurrence-free survival than placebo (5-year rate of recurrence-free survival, 55.4% 95% confidence interval (CI), 50.8 to 59.8 vs. 38.3% 95% CI, 33.9 to 42.7; hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.61 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.72) and a longer distant metastasis-free survival (5-year rate of distant metastasis-free survival, 60.6% 95% CI, 56.0 to 64.9 vs. 44.5% 95% CI, 39.9 to 48.9; hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 0.62 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.75). Similar findings were obtained in the subgroup of 853 patients with PD-L1–positive tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year analysis of adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab resulted in a sustained improvement in the long-term recurrence- and distant metastasis-free survival compared with placebo in patients with resected stage III melanoma. (Funded by Merck ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02362594, and EudraCT number, 2014-004944-37.)
Eggermont et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: