Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The diffusive properties of two coextruded geomembranes, one with a polyamide inner core and the other with an ethylene vinyl-alcohol (EVOH) inner core, and a standard 0.53-mm (20-mil) linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) geomembrane were examined. Diffusion and sorption laboratory tests were performed to estimate the parameters controlling diffusive migration, including the partitioning, diffusion, and permeation coefficients of the geomembrane in both the aqueous and vapor phases. Results indicate a significant reduction in mass flux through the coextruded geomembranes compared to conventional LLDPE. The EVOH coextruded geomembrane had the lowest permeation coefficients (Pg) with a range of (2–6)×10−12 m2 s−1 for diffusion from the aqueous phase. These values for EVOH are upper bounds and the actual values may be lower than as stated. The polyamide (nylon) coextruded geomembrane had higher values than for EVOH, with a Pg range of (0.7–2.2)×10−11 m2 s−1 from the aqueous phase. The highest permeation coefficients were for the standard 20-mil LLDPE, which ranged from (0.6–1.1)×10−10 m2 s−1. Thus the permeation coefficient for LLDPE was about one order of magnitude greater than for the nylon coextruded and at least two orders of magnitudes higher than for the EVOH coextruded geomembrane. Both coextruded geomembranes showed decreased Pg values and therefore improved diffusive resistance to volatile organic compounds over traditional 0.56-mm PVC geomembranes. The EVOH geomembrane showed a 5–12-fold decrease in Pg in comparison to a 2.0-mm high density polyethylene geomembrane.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McWatters et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: