PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 2019Ecological Applications45 citationsOpen Access

Larval and phenological traits predict insect community response to mowing regime manipulations

View Full Paper
RKRoel van KlinkGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity ResearchMMMyles H. M. MenzMax Planck Institute of Animal BehaviorHBHannes BaurNatural History Museum of Bern

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

For the restoration of biodiversity in agricultural grasslands, it is essential to understand how management acts as an ecological filter on the resident species. Mowing constitutes such a filter: only species that possess functional traits enabling them to withstand its consequences can persist in the community. We investigated how the timing of mowing modulates this filtering effect for insects. We predicted that two traits drive species responses. Species with larval development within the meadow vegetation will suffer more from mowing than species whose larvae develop in or on the ground, or outside the meadows, while species with a later phenology should benefit from later mowing. We conducted a five-year experiment, replicated at 12 sites across the Swiss lowlands, applying three different mowing regimes to low-intensity hay meadows: (1) first cut of the year not earlier than 15 June (control regime); (2) the first cut delayed until 15 July; and (3) leaving an uncut grass refuge on 10-20% of the meadow area (after earliest first cut on 15 June). Before the first cut in years 4 or 5, we sampled larvae of Lepidoptera and sawflies, and adults of moths, parasitoid wasps, wild bees, hoverflies, ground beetles, and rove beetles. Overall, before the first cut of the year, abundances of species with vegetation-dwelling larvae were higher in meadows with delayed mowing or an uncut grass refuge, with some taxon-specific variation. In contrast, species whose larval development is independent of the meadow vegetation showed no differences in abundance between mowing regimes. Species richness did not differ among regimes. For species with vegetation-dwelling larvae, a fourth-corner analysis showed an association between early phenology and the control regime. No associations were found for the other functional groups. Our results show that slight modifications of mowing regimes, easily implementable in agri-environmental policy schemes, can boost invertebrate abundance, potentially benefitting insectivorous vertebrates.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Klink et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d967b05e5bcb4e3b83631chttps://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1900
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits2006 · 4,635 citations
  2. 2Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing1995 · 111,626 citations
  3. 3Modern Applied Statistics with S2002 · 24,677 citations
  4. 4Harpalus (s. str.) subcylindricus DEJEAN, 1829 (Coleoptera, Carabidae) auch in der Schweiz und im Elsass (F)2010 · 2 citations
  5. 5Changes in microclimate induced by experimental warming and clipping in tallgrass prairie2002 · 299 citations