PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2000IEEE Transactions on Image Processing507 citations

Landmark matching via large deformation diffeomorphisms

View Full Paper
SJSarang JoshiMMMichael I. Miller

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This paper describes the generation of large deformation diffeomorphisms phi: Omega=0, 13Omega for landmark matching generated as solutions to the transport equation dphi (x, t) /dt=nu (phi (x, t), t), epsilon0, 1 and phi (x, 0) =x, with the image map defined as phi (. , 1) and therefore controlled via the velocity field nu (. , t), epsilon0, 1. Imagery are assumed characterized via sets of landmarks xn, yn, n=1, 2,. . . , N. The optimal diffeomorphic match is constructed to minimize a running smoothness cost parallelLnu parallel2 associated with a linear differential operator L on the velocity field generating the diffeomorphism while simultaneously minimizing the matching end point condition of the landmarks. Both inexact and exact landmark matching is studied here. Given noisy landmarks xn matched to yn measured with error covariances Sigman, then the matching problem is solved generating the optimal diffeomorphism phi; (x, 1) =integral0 (1) nu (phi (x, t), t) dt+x where nu (. ) =argmin (nu. ) integral1 (0) integralOmega parallelLnu (x, t) parallel2dxdt +Sigman=1Nyn-phi (xn, 1) TSigman (-1) yn-phi (xn, 1). Conditions for the existence of solutions in the space of diffeomorphisms are established, with a gradient algorithm provided for generating the optimal flow solving the minimum problem. Results on matching two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) imagery are presented in the macaque monkey.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Joshi et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d967fe5e5bcb4e3b83633fhttps://doi.org/10.1109/83.855431
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper