PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 22, 2010SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología297 citationsOpen Access

Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) Checklist

LMLidwine B. MokkinkInstitute of Public HealthCTCaroline B. TerweeUniversity of BernEGElizabeth GibbonsUniversity of Chicago

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Results indicated that raters often choose the same response option, but that it is difficult on item level to distinguish between articles. When using the COSMIN checklist in a systematic review, we recommend getting some training and experience, completing it by two independent raters, and reaching consensus on one final rating. Instructions for using the checklist are improved.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mokkink et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d968e58988aeabbe6852echttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-82
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper