Key result
EMB yields only ~38% sensitivity for cardiac sarcoidosis, but clinical predictors improve diagnostic yield.
Why the study?
Comprehensive analyses of the current diagnostic performance of endomyocardial biopsy in cardiac sarcoidosis are not available despite historically low sensitivity.
What is the diagnostic sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy and its clinical predictors in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis?
Observational (n=260)
What is the diagnostic sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy and its clinical predictors in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis?
The diagnostic sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy in cardiac sarcoidosis increases significantly with disease severity, reaching up to 88% when multiple clinical and imaging predictors are present.
AIMS: We set out to assess the utility of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Historically, EMB sensitivity in CS is only ≤25%, but comprehensive analyses of its current diagnostic performance are not available. METHODS AND RESULTS: The data of 260 consecutive patients with CS (mean age 49 years, 60% female) meeting the Heart Rhythm Society diagnostic criteria were analysed retrospectively. Overall, 216 patients (83%) had undergone EMB, 47 with repeat procedures. EMB overall sensitivity was 38%, rising to 49% after repeat biopsies. On logistic regression analysis, positive EMB was predicted independently by presentation with ventricular tachyarrhythmia with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-12.0, p = 0.021), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.1, p = 0.004), elevation of cardiac troponins (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.4, p = 0.024), and presence of late gadolinium enhancement in left ventricular mid-apical septal segments on magnetic resonance imaging (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-13.8, p = 0.024). EMB sensitivity, counting in repeats, was 16% in patients (n = 37) without any independent predictor versus 38%, 60%, 79%, and 88% in those with 1 (n = 76), 2 (n = 62), 3 (n = 33), and 4/4 (n = 8) predictors, respectively. The rate of serious complications was 0.7% without mortality or permanent harm. Positive EMB was not an independent predictor of prognosis. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of EMB in CS depends on the extent, activity, and location of myocardial involvement, being the higher the more severe CS is. Its use should rely on weighing the pre-test likelihood and individual value of positive biopsy against the procedural risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mälkönen et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Cardiac sarcoidosis (n=260). Endomyocardial biopsy was evaluated on Overall sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy. Endomyocardial biopsy in cardiac sarcoidosis demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 38%, which rose to 88% in patients with four independent clinical and imaging predictors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: