Why the study?
Antibiotic prophylaxis decreases surgical site infections, but trends in its use in this surgical ward setting were not established.
What are the trends and adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in a governmental hospital in the Riyadh Region?
What are the trends and adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in a governmental hospital in the Riyadh Region?
There is a major problem with adherence to surgical prophylaxis guidelines regarding antibiotic selection and duration in the studied hospital.
High inappropriate surgical prophylaxis rates may promote resistance; leaves open stewardship intervention efficacy in similar settings.
Antibiotic prophylaxis is used to decrease the bacterial load in the wound to assist the natural host defenses in preventing the occurrence of surgical site infections. The present study aimed to investigate trends in using antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical ward of a governmental hospital in the Riyadh Region and included collecting data concerning the use of antibiotic prophylaxis from medical electronic records. During 2020, most of the surgical patients received systemic antibiotics (82.40%). The most prescribed antibiotics were ceftriaxone (28.44%) and metronidazole (26.36%). The study also found that most of the patients received antibiotics for seven days or for five days, and only 1.08% of the patients received antibiotics appropriately for a maximum of one day. The present study showed that there was a major problem in selecting the correct antibiotic and in the duration of its use compared with the recommendations of the surgical prophylaxis guideline that was issued by the Saudi Ministry of Health. Thus, there is an urgent need to improve the adherence to the recommendations of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in order to reduce the occurrence of negative consequences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: