PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1965JAMA297 citations

Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pericardial Effusion

View Full Paper
HFHarvey Feigenbaum

Structured PICO

Does reflected ultrasound accurately diagnose pericardial effusion?

P
Population
5 dogs with artificially produced pericardial effusion, followed by unspecified clinical studies
I
Intervention
Reflected ultrasound
C
Comparator
Baseline state without pericardial fluid
O
Outcome
Differentiation between a large, dilated heart and pericardial effusion via detection of ultrasound echoessurrogate

Reflected ultrasound provides a highly effective, simple, and safe method for diagnosing pericardial effusion.

Abstract

The differentiation between a large, dilated heart and pericardial effusion is essential but frequently difficult. The clinician must often resort to diagnostic procedures which offer some hazard to the patient. The use of reflected ultrasound was found to be a highly effective and simple method of making this differential diagnosis. In five dogs with artificially produced pericardial effusion it was noted that without pericardial fluid only one ultrasound echo was produced in the vicinity of the posterior heart wall. When fluid was introduced, one detected two echoes, one which moved with cardiac action, the posterior heart wall, and another which moved only with respiration, the pericardium. The space between the two signals represented the pericardial fluid. Subsequent clinical studies confirmed the accuracy, reliability, and simplicity of this diagnostic procedure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harvey Feigenbaum (1965) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9870b5e5bcb4e3b836f1dhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1965.03080090025006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper