PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 201880 citationsOpen Access

Findings of the WMT 2018 Shared Task on Quality Estimation

LSLucia SpeciaFBFrédéric BlainVLVarvara Logacheva

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We report the results of the WMT18 shared task on Quality Estimation, i.e. the task of predicting the quality of the output of machine translation systems at various granularity levels: word, phrase, sentence and document. This year we include four language pairs, three text domains, and translations produced by both statistical and neural machine translation systems. Participating teams from ten institutions submitted a variety of systems to different task variants and language pairs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Specia et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d98e58a1d151c65f6847bchttps://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w18-6451
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Machine Translation Quality and Post-Editor Productivity2016 · 29 citations
  2. 2More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences2000 · 379 citations
  3. 3Image-Based Recommendations on Styles and Substitutes2015 · 2,346 citations
  4. 4Exploiting Generative AI to Scale up Intelligent Tutoring Systems2023 · 79,073 citations
  5. 5UAlacant machine translation quality estimation at WMT 2018: a simple approach using phrase tables and feed-forward neural networks2018 · 1 citations