We examine whether rational investor responses to information uncertainty (IU) explain properties of and returns to the post‐earnings‐announcement‐drift (PEAD) trading anomaly. Consistent with a rational learning explanation, we find that: (1) unexpected earnings (UE) signals that are characterized as having greater IU have more muted initial market reactions; (2) extreme UE portfolios are characterized by securities with higher IU than non‐extreme UE portfolios; and (3) within the extreme UE portfolios, high IU securities are more prevalent and earn larger abnormal returns than low IU securities. Further tests show that prior evidence of greater PEAD profitability for higher idiosyncratic volatility securities is explained by the greater information uncertainty associated with these securities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Francis et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: