The pseudohelical hydrocarbons (R)-6, (S)-7, and (R)-8 and the helical hydrocarbon (P)-9, formally derived from the helical hydrocarbon (P)-4 by stepwise replacement of each of the four-membered rings by a five-membered ring, have been prepared. Their optical rotations vary systematically, both in magnitude and sign. Of the extremes, (P)-4 represents the usual case of a right-handed dextrorotatory helix, while (P)-9 represents the unusual case of a right-handed levorotatory helix. To rationalize these facts, DFT calculations of the rotatory power of (P)-helices of three-, four-, and five-membered rings have been performed. The results show a very good agreement with the experimental data for the rigid helices of three-membered rings and always show the correct sign and order of magnitude for the flexible helices of four- and five-membered rings for which Boltzmann-averaged optical rotations of up to six conformers had to be used. Within the conformers of the latter, a set of large dihedral angles for the bonds of the inner sphere correspond to a high specific rotation, and a set of small dihedral angles correspond to a low specific rotation. As a consequence, the Boltzmann-averaged values markedly depend on the geometry and weight of the conformers involved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Widjaja et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: