PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 24, 2018Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization12 citationsOpen Access

Let the punishment fit the criminal: An experimental study

View Full Paper
JMJosef MontagJTJames Tremewan

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

• We find people condition punishment on the subjective experience of punishees. • This holds for monetary and non-monetary punishment. • Fines and non-monetary punishments differ in terms of punishee subjective experience. • Fines and non-monetary punishments do not differ as proportion of maximum punishment. We use a laboratory experiment to study the extent to which people tailor levels of punishment to the subjective experience of the person to receive that punishment, for both monetary and non-monetary sanctions. We find that subjects tend to apply higher fines to wealthier individuals. Additionally, subjects assign more repetitions of a tedious task to those with a lower willingness to pay to avoid it. We find no evidence that the distributions of monetary and non-monetary punishments are different when considered as proportions of the maximum possible punishment, but that this does not hold when non-monetary punishments are converted into monetary equivalents. This suggests that subjects do not have in mind a particular level of disutility from the punishment, but rather are guided by the sentencing possibilities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Montag et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9a4011ad561c673684d49https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.07.011
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper