Knowledge about the chemical speciation of Hg(II) is a prerequisite for a proper understanding of biogeochemical processes in control of the transformation of Hg(II) into toxic and bioaccumulating monomethyl mercury. Of critical importance are structures and the stability of Hg(II)-complexes with inorganic and organic sulfur ligands in aqueous and solid phases of soils and sediments. On the basis of Hg L(III)-edge EXAFS experiments, we report Hg(II) to form a four-coordinated metacinnabar [beta-HgS(s)] phase when reacted with disordered FeS(s) (mackinawite), at pH 9.0 and a Hg(II) to FeS(s) molar ratio of 0.002-0.012. When Hg(II) (1000-20,000 microg Hg g(-1)) was added to mixtures of <5 days of aged FeS(s) (2-20%) and an organic soil at pH 5.7-6.1, a mixture of Hg(II) coordinated with two organic thiols [Hg(SR)(2)] and Hg(II) coordinated with four inorganic sulfides in a metacinnabar-like phase was formed. Surface complex formation between Hg(II) and FeS(s), or substitution of Hg(II) for Fe(II) in FeS(s), was not observed. Quantities of beta-HgS(s) and Hg(SR)(2) formed (as determined by EXAFS) were in fair agreement with theoretical thermodynamic calculations, as described by the reaction: Hg(SR)(2) + FeS(s) = HgS(s) + Fe(2+) + 2RS(-). The calculated stability constant for this reaction (log K = -16.1 - -15.4) supports a strong bonding of Hg(II) to organic thiols, corresponding to a log beta(2) for the formation of Hg(SR)(2) on the order of 42 or greater.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skyllberg et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: