Is there a relationship between corporate environmental performance (CEP) and stock returns? And if so, what drives this relationship: changes in corporate risk exposure or mispricing because of investors' taste for high CEP stocks, based on personal values or social norms? To answer these questions, we use a new and comprehensive ranking that measures the environmental performance of the 500 largest publicly traded US corporations. Our methodology is based on the Fama--French--Carhart four-factor asset-pricing model. In addition, we incorporate a fifth factor to capture common CEP-related risks. The results point to a negative relationship between CEP and stock returns, partially driven by common CEP-related risks. At the same time though, the influence of taste cannot be ruled out.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haan et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: