Retrospective study identifies histological markers linked to anastomotic stenosis in adults undergoing esophageal surgery, suggesting potential for risk assessment.
Objective: To evaluate histopathological markers of inflammation and tissue repair in esophageal specimens obtained during substitution surgery and determine their association with postoperative anastomotic stenosis.Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.Setting: Tertiary care referral center (Clínica de Tracto Digestivo Superior, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga").Participants: Sixteen adults undergoing esophageal substitution for benign disease between January 2012 and January 2022. Inclusion required complete clinical records and native esophageal histology; cases with malignancy or missing histology were excluded.Methods: Archived slides from the proximal esophageal margin were reviewed with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome. A semi-quantitative score assessed neutrophilic infiltration, lymphocytic infiltration, collagen deposition, and granulation tissue across mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis (range 0-18), classifying profiles as low risk (≤15) or high risk (≥16). Patients were grouped by presence (CEA) or absence (SEA) of postoperative stenosis. Statistical comparisons used Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U, with medians (IQR) and exact p-values.Results: Median total histological scores were higher in CEA than SEA (18 [17-18] vs 12 [9-15]; P=0.014). All stenosis cases were high-risk, whereas 92.3% of non-stenosis cases were low-risk (P=0.007). Individual inflammatory markers were not statistically different between groups; however, collagen deposition and granulation tissue appeared more severe among CEA patients. No meaningful differences in demographic or operative variables were observed.Conclusion: In this exploratory study, a composite histopathological score identified patients at increased risk of postoperative anastomotic stenosis. The approach may support risk stratification and surveillance in gastrointestinal reconstructive surgery and warrants external validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cázares-García et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: