Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study evaluates hydrolysis methods for monosaccharide analysis in acidic polysaccharides, indicating improved accuracy with enzyme-acid protocols.
Accurate monosaccharide composition analysis was a prerequisite for studying the structure and function of polysaccharides. This study evaluated three one-step hydrolysis methods (H₂SO₄, trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and Driselase) on polysaccharides with varying uronic acid contents and developed an enzyme--acid hydrolysis protocol for acidic polysaccharides. Results demonstrated that neutral tamarind seed polysaccharide (TSP) was effectively hydrolyzed by H₂SO₄/TFA with hydrolysis yields exceeding 97%. However, acidic polysaccharides, including peach gum polysaccharide (PGP), phyllanthus emblica polysaccharide (PEP), and passion fruit pectin (PFP), showed low hydrolysis yields with one-step methods. A Driselase-H₂SO₄ hydrolysis strategy was then established involving Driselase pretreatment, followed by H₂SO₄ hydrolysis at optimized conditions (0.5-2.0 M, 60-90 min). This protocol increased the hydrolysis yields of PGP, PEP, and PFP to 97.41%, 86.17%, and 87.06%, respectively, with high repeatability and precision. These results were significantly higher than those from one-step hydrolysis methods, effectively improving the accuracy of the monosaccharide composition analysis for acidic polysaccharides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: