Investigates how aluminum and iron materials stabilize organic carbon in water treatment processes, suggesting ecological benefits.
Sorption of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) by mineral oxides is a key process for preserving organic matter (OM) against rapid microbial degradation and leaching. While this mechanism is well studied in natural soils, the use of water treatment residuals (WTRs) rich in metal oxyhydroxides remains underexplored. This study investigated the potential of aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) WTRs to stabilize DOC in batch sorption experiments. DOC, derived from anaerobically digested sludge, was added at concentrations of 0 – 120 ppm. Sorption capacity was assessed using distribution coefficient (K d ) derived from the Initial Mass (IM) isotherm model, with Fe-WTR showing a higher K d value (14.2, R 2 = 0.9619) than Al-WTR (6.1, R 2 = 0.9753). Post-sorption fractionation using Liquid Chromatography-Organic Carbon Detection-Organic Nitrogen Detection (LC-OCD-OND) and fluorescence spectroscopy showed that both WTRs decreased hydrophobic DOC, biopolymers, humic substances and low molecular substances. Parallel factor analysis indicated greater removal of humic-like (19.2%) and tryptophan-like proteins (61.1%) by Al-WTR. Despite Fe-WTR's higher predicted sorption, the SUVA 25 , model's “b" value and desorption data indicated weaker sorption and unstable Fe complexes. Al-WTR appeared as a more effective adsorbent for enhancing DOC stabilization. These results suggest that Al-WTR is a more effective material for DOC stabilization. Its sorptive potential could enhance carbon storage thus increasing the potential for carbon sequestration when used in natural systems. • Fe-WTR shows higher DOC affinity but weaker sorption stability than Al-WTR. • Al-WTR retains more stable DOC through stronger sorption mechanisms. • Both WTRs reduce high and low molecular weight DOC fractions. • WTRs show potential for long-term carbon stabilization in soil applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lukashe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: