Cross-sectional analysis establishes baseline vowel formant data in healthy Korean adults, indicating clinical implications.
Objectives: This study aims to establish large-scale normative data for vowel formant frequencies and speech intelligibility (SI) in healthy Korean adults, providing a critical resource for clinical and pedagogical applications in speech-language pathology and voice science.Methods: A comprehensive cross-sectional analysis of 4,235 healthy Korean adults across three distinct age groups was conducted. We systematically measured multiple acoustic variables including F1, F2, vowel space areas (VSA_3, VSA_4, VSA_5), Vowel Articulation Index, Formant Centralization Ratio, and F2 ratio using customized Praat scripts, and assessed subjective SI through perceptual measures to establish reliable baseline data.Results: Significant age-related differences were found in all variables except the F2 ratio (p=.14). Significant sex-based differences were confirmed for all variables except the F1 of /o/ (p=.327). All acoustic metrics correlated significantly with SI, with VSA_5 demonstrating the highest correlation among all vowel space metrics (r=-.56, p<.01), suggesting its potential clinical utility as a complementary objective measure for speech assessment.Conclusion: This study provides robust, large-scale normative data confirming that age and sex significantly influence Korean vowel acoustics, with older age groups showing notable reductions in VSA and SI. Among the acoustic metrics examined, VSA_5 showed the strongest correlation with perceived speech intelligibility, indicating its potential as a meaningful objective complement to subjective SI assessment. These findings may offer a practical reference for clinicians in voice assessment, differential diagnosis, and monitoring rehabilitation progress in individuals with speech and voice disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: