Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework improves velocity control in hydraulic excavators, suggesting advancements in construction automation.
Hydraulic excavators remain among the least automated construction machines due to nonlinear hydraulics, varying environment interactions, and strict real-time requirements. We present a physics-informed online learning framework that provides a standardized velocity-level control interface, abstracting machine-specific hydraulics and enabling integration with higher-level automation. A physics-motivated base model is augmented with an online residual learner to compensate nonlinearities in real time. Experiments on a 12-ton excavator in leveling, grading, and a demanding 4-point cycle show substantial improvements over the base model alone: maximum absolute tracking error is reduced by up to 63 % in leveling and 70 % in the 4-point cycle, while RMSE is reduced by up to 54 % and 69 %.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weber et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: