Proposes a framework to enhance medical interactions by valuing tacit knowledge, suggesting a shift towards equitable care.
In an era of medical digitization, tacit knowledge – experiential, context-dependent knowing central to humanistic care – faces marginalization despite technological advances. Drawing on Michael Polanyi’s theory, this paper advocates for a “Professional–Care Recipient Interactionism” framework, which transcends the doctor-patient dyad by integrating epistemic pluralism, bidirectional power dynamics, and structural contextualization. This framework safeguards medical practice integrity by valuing tacit knowledge from both professionals and care recipients, bridging micro-interactions with macro structures to foster equitable, dignity-affirming care. Embedding tacit knowledge within this framework is essential to ensure technology serves, not replaces, medicine’s humanistic core.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: